The
Understanding Evolution Web site by the University of California at Berkeley has been in the news lately or I would not have heard of it. It provides a good overview of evolution for teachers and the general public.
And why are they in the news? One Jeanne E. Caldwell decided to file a suit claiming that this information about evolution used taxpayer funds and constitutes religious proseletizing--by endorsing, among other things,
"The religious doctrine that religion and religious beliefs are limited to the spiritual and supernatural world." (The italics are mine.) What planet is she from? In my opinion, that statement would be an opinion, not a doctrine—if, in fact, the Web site said such a thing, which I doubt. It currently says,
"In science, only natural causes are used to explain natural phenomena, while religion deals with beliefs that are beyond the natural world." It does not say that religion deals
only with the supernatural, but it does say that science is limited to natural phenomena. Either of those statements is very different from the plaintiff's interpretation. In any case, to have the force of doctrine, a statement must be uttered by the religious organization itself—opinions by a third party describing religions in general do not count. The case was aided by a "public interest" group that ought to have had better advice.
Ms. Caldwell asked for damages because the Web pages offended her and made her feel like an outsider. The suit was dismissed by a judge in California on March 13th. Follow the link to read Ed Brayton's article at Dispatches from the Culture Wars and find a PDF version of the judgement on Science Blogs. The case is also analyzed by
Timothy Sandefur at The Panda's Thumb.
It seems that Larry and Jean Caldwell make a habit of filing frivolous lawsuits in creationist causes. In this case, Jeanne Caldwell was represented by her lawyer husband, Larry Caldwell, and two other lawyers, Kevin T. Snider and Matthew McReynolds. Ironically, one of the defendants is also named Caldwell: Roy L. Caldwell is the Director of the
University of California Museum of Paleontology. The other, David Lindberg (which the judgement renders as both "Lindberg" and "Linburg"), is Chair of the
Integrative Biology Department of the University of California at Berkeley. A third defendant, Michael Piburn, Program Director for the
National Science Foundation, was not a party to the motion to dismiss the suit.
Labels: education, evolution, museums, religion, rhetoric, science, U.S.